Agent action filter
Pre-check on every agent action. Best setup: Jev filters everything and only suspicious actions go to Gemini. That caught all tested attacks at lower cost.
Real ways builders use JEV to turn context into fast, structured decisions. Find an idea, read the original post, and vote for what inspires you.
Every idea points to the builder who shared it.
Pre-check on every agent action. Best setup: Jev filters everything and only suspicious actions go to Gemini. That caught all tested attacks at lower cost.
Chrome extension walks the DOM and removes ads in real time.
Replaced the model that routes each Firstmate task to an agent. On 25 tasks it matched Fable's routing in about 200 ms, about 71% cheaper and 90% faster.
Lead agent verifies worker evidence before accepting a result, instead of re-reading every job. After about 10 hours, lead-agent token use was about 60% lower.
Used Jev on his custom memory system. He reports 94% fewer tokens and 2-3x faster memory retrieval. He calls it a quick test.
JevScope judges whether a coding agent is aligned, progressing, or stuck. Traces alone do not say that.
Shipped Jev to production as their AI assistant's reranker, still behind a feature flag for selected customers. Early numbers: 3.3x faster (390 ms vs 1.29 s p50), slowest call 0.5 s vs 3.1 s, 55% cheaper, 0 errors.
Ported an AI review feature from GPT models (about 2 minutes) to Jev. Same results in testing, in seconds instead of minutes.
Added Jev to DeepAPI. On this benchmark it ignored all legitimate API calls and flagged all abusive ones, for less than $0.001.
Open-sourced lab where game state plus typed questions drive the agent, with replayable evidence.
Open-source jev-guard hook for cheap auto-approvals, because built-in auto-approve modes are missing or expensive.
Decides whether two supplier listings are the same part. On 35k items, Gemini was about $23 and about 4 pairs/s; Jev was about $1.50, about 150 pairs/s, and finished in 4 minutes. They agreed on 89%. He frames it as a test, not a stated production deploy.
Replayed 3,300 real decisions: source ranking, message routing, and already-sent checks. Jev caught 13 support preferences their classifier had dumped in other. Correct-source-first went from 60% to 90%.
Sends Stagehand's accessibility tree and candidate actions to Jev, which picks the next action. One remote-browser task cost $0.001.
Jev is live on rtrvr.ai, a free browser agent. Recorded tasks took about 40% less time. The LLM plans and writes code; Jev chooses the next browser action. One find-creators task took 40 seconds.
Jev classified 500 emails in seconds for 3.5 cents.
jev-rules asks one yes/no per project rule in a single Jev call and injects only the rules that score yes into Claude Code. In his recordings Jev judged 12 rules in 367 to 773 ms, about $0.00002 per prompt. Over 8 checkout prompts, delivered rules were about 330 tokens versus about 1,390 for loading all 12.
Dental triage as 25 typed facts plus a code rule table, shared by the phone agent and the mailbox. On 1,240 emails, time per email went from 2.0 seconds to 0.29 seconds. Won 19 of 23 blind disagreements. Confidence bands choose act, review, or human. Silence is the decision for 23% of the inbox.
Script.it scores the raw git diff with Jev and only calls an LLM when Jev flags something. Zero false positives on their review data, about 50x faster and 100x cheaper than a GLM, Grok, and Gemini ensemble. The ensemble caught more bugs. Jev caught about 3 in 4.
A context-handoff plugin uses Jev to filter old read-only tool records while keeping instructions, file paths, and unfinished work. Ships as a Codex skill, MCP tool, and CLI, open source under MIT.
She had turned auto mode off in her coding agent because classification was slow, and turned it back on now that they are using Jev.
28 decisions across sandbox security, search ranking, and accessibility. Tokens dropped from 49,000 to 8,739, about 3x faster, and cost went from $0.24 to $0.0026.
Put Jev in front of Claude to filter candidate files in Aition. 33% fewer files to the model, 25% fewer tokens, 23% less cost, $0.037 to score 543 files at 0.38s per file, and 0 loss in recall.
Benchmarked Jev as the shell-command reviewer in Vercel's fx. Up to 18x faster at p95 and more accurate than GPT Luna, and it may become the default.
Score every tool call and drop the junk instead of a summarization prompt. Matt Van Horn's roundup says a Claude plugin took one session from 1 million tokens to 86,000 in one second. Link is the roundup, not the original build posts.
Chrome extension hides engagement bait, empty hooks, and ads before they are seen. Rules are plain English; Jev checks every post in half a second. A follow-up says it cost about $0.002 for 100+ posts.
Tested Jev against gpt-5.4-mini, gpt-5.6-sol, and gpt-6-astra on deal-signal detection, request routing, tool selection, memory decisions, and workflow discovery. Jev was 16x cheaper than mini and about 230x cheaper than astra. Stronger on deal-signal detection; larger models were better on complex memory judgments.
Turns what the driver sees into bounded action IDs and lets Jev pick one. One run: 44.9 seconds and about $0.001, versus Astra at 294.9 seconds and about $1.45. They say that is one run only.
jevscan is a Chrome extension that detects malicious addresses and transactions on Etherscan in real time using Jev.
Tested Jev against GPT-5.5 and a few lines of if/else on one job: deciding what a coding agent does after a failed test. Jev's routing cost was 125x lower than GPT's.
Wired Jev to Browser Use, with a small LLM only for typing. Finding flights took 7 seconds and cost $0.0039. Open-sourced.
FlightWifi is a Chrome extension that checks whether a flight's Wi-Fi supports video calls, email, or nothing, detects Starlink versus traditional Wi-Fi, and shows the verdict on Google Flights.
Built an agent router using Jev plus Herd, and posted a video of it. Light on measured results.
Jev is inside Agently's inbox sweep. On the same 47 messages: about 14s to under 1s per sweep, 7x cheaper per decision at the same context, 30% cheaper while reading 5x more of each message. Sweeps every 5 minutes instead of every 55. 38 ignored, 8 sorted to him, 5 with a reply drafted, 1 flagged as unsure.
Uses Jev for instant compaction: score every tool call and drop what is irrelevant, instead of a summarization prompt. This is her own post, not the roundup.
Added an agent command to AXe, a non-agentic iOS simulator tool. Jev picks the next action from the prompt and the current state.
Rebuilt a job crawler with Jev: start at a company homepage, find Careers, and score roles against his profile. An LLM version took about 5 minutes; Jev took just over 20 seconds in his test. Packaged as the skill jev-job-hunter.
Classified work model, seniority, benefits, and location on 40,000 jobs for $4, then deleted the old regex classifier.
Kalshi 15-minute BTC yes/no bot. Jev calls yes, no, or lean; the bot fires at most one order per window with stake locked at $2. Confidence gate is at least 0.55. The judge is paper; the trader uses live Kalshi keys, with a kill switch.
Predictive launcher: Jev reads intent so typing a phrase like the pdf I just downloaded already ranks the newest PDF, with a confidence on every keystroke, in about 100 ms.
A classifier test uses Jev via OpenRouter to take legal prompts and choose which database in his legal chatbot to search.
Chrome extension scores each LinkedIn post on six authenticity checks in one call.
Jev reads a price feed, chooses buy or sell, and places real orders on Kuru's on-chain book every 300 ms block. Open-sourced.
Chrome extension classifies X notes and accounts as LLM-written or engagement farming, skips YouTube sponsorships, blocks ads, labels dark patterns, flags fake Amazon reviews, and removes cookie banners.
A production layer around Jev: policy, confidence gate, shadow mode, recipes, and action-level evals. On one 24-row natural-language filter, Claude CLI took 48.9 seconds and Jev plus the harness took 1.3 seconds.
First look, not a full benchmark: 24 Norwegian hearing responses. He says Jev reads Norwegian, costs $0.22 per 1,000 docs, and at 0.9+ confidence was right 14 of 15 times.
Chrome extension for Polymarket suggestions using Jev. He says Claude did most of the building. Light on measured results.
jev() is a PostgreSQL extension that filters rows in natural language with no index and no embeddings. 129 rows judged in about 1 second for $0.0009; the second run was 6 ms from cache.
Jev picks which LLM handles each prompt. About 20x cheaper, 6x faster, around 140 ms.
Retrieve as usual, then run Jev on every chunk and delete the irrelevant ones. Also from Van Horn's roundup. The original post was not opened separately.
Jev and GPT-6 Astra play Minecraft in real time through his agentic system. They can fight multiple zombies at once. Jev makes the quick decisions; Astra plans ahead.
Jev at about 200 ms through Vercel AI Gateway plays against GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Haiku. The ball only moves when the model decides.
Benchmarked Jev on HiringCafe (2.5 million monthly active users) scoring resume against job-description relevance. Human-labeled Spearman correlation: Jev 0.79 at $0.02, versus Gemini 3.1-Flash-lite 0.72 at $0.29.
Janus tests real traffic to find where Jev should handle easy decisions and a stronger model the hard ones. On his tests: up to 53% lower cost, 80.2% accuracy vs 78.8% with the stronger model alone, 302 ms median latency vs 2.27 s.
Two production jobs. On 120 hand-built biotech 8-K cases Jev matched production. On 30,582 real filings it was worse (3.9% wrong vs 0.9%). On trial-eligibility facts it caught 75% of planted errors, with many false positives. Kept as a first-pass filter.
Ran 34 security cases through Jev and four chat models. Jev was 47x cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 for the full run and 438x cheaper than Claude Opus 5, at 0.29 seconds per decision versus Opus 5's 10.81. Accuracy: Jev 14 of 20 incident decisions and 9 of 14 trace decisions. Under four adversarial probes Jev produced zero downgrades.
Working Jev into security workflows for incident response and threat hunting: ranking hunt results, scoring hosts, classifying noisy activity, labeling false positives. He does not claim these are shipped yet.
Open-sourced Foreman, a software-factory foreman built with Jev. Coding agents work the floor; Foreman assesses progress, completeness, tests, drift, and verification, and intervenes when needed.
Alan's task router now runs on Jev for faster routing. Lighter on measured detail than the others.
Type a law, Claude invents the reactions, and Jev decides how each of 40 citizens responds. The town sim plays those choices out.
Demo where Jev reads dozens of structured trading signals and shows a decision. He says it is still experimental and there are no real trades yet.
An agent router on Jev. Call 1 scores department, urgency, and frustration, then code picks the agent. Call 2 scores complexity and stakes, then code picks the LLM and reasoning depth.
Jev plus SuperX scores posts for virality. Every post gets 61 questions in about 1 second for $0.0004, fitted on 9,481 posts from 207 creators. It picks the viral post 2 in 3 times. Only the text goes into the classifier.
Controls the browser with his voice. The transcript goes to Jev, which returns probabilities in about 300 ms, and the browser clicks. Cost is $0.0002 per decision.
Local Whisper plus Jev classifies what he says. A small Swift app passes the screen's accessibility tree so Jev can decide what to click.
Jev plus Mercury 2.5 using WebMCP solved 100% of their tasks at roughly 112x lower model cost than GPT-6 Astra with computer use and code execution. Without WebMCP their Browser Use setup solved 25/49; with WebMCP, 49/49. Jev picks the tool; Mercury generates arguments.
Jev is now available in Dify's Question Classifier node, used to route inputs across workflow branches.
Shipped optional Jev compaction to Xal. He says it now compacts super fast.
Bring-your-own-key Chrome extension that scores and filters AI slop while you scroll, and caches the results.
Share your X post and help someone find their next idea. Suggestions are reviewed before they appear.